|
Professional
Responsibility
How do we know when a lawyer is being "professionally responsible"? The question, at least for me, turns out to be harder than I would think it would be. Perhaps we need, to reformulate the question: What are the sources and the basis for a lawyer's "professional responsibility"? A DICTIONARY DEFINITION: RESPONSIBILITY Responsibility (with some help from Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary) Responsibility: Responsible: Syn.: Responsible, Answerable, Accountable, Amenable, Liable mean subject to an authority that may punish default, Responsible implies holding a formal organization role, duty, or trust; Answerable suggests a relation between one having a moral or legal obligation and a court or other authority charged with oversight of its observance; Accountable suggests imminence of retribution for unfulfilled trust or violated obligation; Amenable and Liable stress the fact of subjection to review, censure, or control by a designated authority under certain conditions." Response: [middle French & Latin, to promise
in return, answer] Respondent: one who responds, as one who maintains a thesis in reply; one who answers in various legal proceedings (as in equity cases); the prevailing party in the lower court (in contrast with the appellant).
Why I don't use the term legal ethics Legal ethics (and professional responsibility) as these names have been used to describe a course of law school study put the emphasis on rules (and law), on a body of ethical rules (Rules for Professional Conduct). legal ethics procedure procedure ordinary morality head reason
Some thoughts about how the study of "lawyer ethics"
might be different
We begin by trying to get a better sense of how an adversary
system of justice and the adversarial ethos and culture it produces (in
its current configuration) has a serious moral undertow. | ||||