lawyers and literature

Exercise 2-1: Reading Lawyer Stories

We begin a lawyer story with questions:

What is this story all about? How is the lawyer in the story related to the larger world in which he or she is trying to live?

What happens to the lawyer in this story (and to you as the reader of the story)?

What does this story have to say about the lives lawyers lead?

How does the story speak to the life you are trying to live or want to live?

What kind of demands does this story make on the reader?

How is one to read, seriously and critically, lawyer stories that are offered to us as "fiction"? As a reader, what kind of skills do you need to give meaning to these stories? (What does it mean to engage in a meaningful reading of a text?) How can a story you dislike and disapprove of be meaningful? How can a story be meaningful if you "like" it and it confirms what you already know and believe about yourself and your world?

How do we, or can we, or should we, attempt to learn about ourselves as lawyers from "fiction"? In what sense do fictional stories of lawyers "educate" us as lawyers?

Of what significance is it, to your response, that the authors of a "fictional" work may or may not be a lawyer?

In what sense are our own lives works of fiction?

What do you bring to each of the stories as a reader that makes your reading meaningful? Worthwhile? Hopeful? Instructive? Threatening? How does your reading (and your understanding) of your own life and social relations help (and hinder) your reading of these stories? [What You Bring With You]

Choose a story you find difficult to read. Is it possible to learn something about yourself as a reader from the difficulties you experience as a reader?

Is it possible to read ourselves the way we read other "texts"? Is there a connection between reading and self-knowledge?

 

  Lawyers and Literature Home Page